Election Integrity Database
The truth about elections, held to a single standard.
Elections documented, attacked, and defended — with proven falsification kept strictly apart from interference, propaganda, and mere anomaly. Every finding is tiered by the strength of its evidence.
- 64
- elections
- 20
- operations
- 555
- sources
Database last updated September 24, 2026
The VoteRights game
Can you tell what is on the record?
Verdict deals you real records: established findings beside claims that did not hold up, voting rules, turnout, the history of the vote. Swipe fast and keep the streak. Ten new cards every day, the same for everyone.
Research tools
Interrogate the evidence, not just the headlines
Ask precise questions, compare cases, trace documented relationships, inspect change over time, and reuse the underlying data.
Ask the database
Show me cases where Foreign interference was established and Result falsification was not established. 16 cases match.
Investigations
Short, curated paths through cases and primary evidence.
4 guided pathsCompare
Compare the evidence fingerprints of three elections.
201620202016Network
Walk from a case to its findings, sources and related records.
1,034 records · 1,830 linksCountry Twins
Find countries with comparable voting rules and safeguards.
8 rules comparedSafeguards matrix
Compare ballot type, audits, observation and voting rules across every country profile.
51 countries side by sideTime Machine
See when records entered the public database and changed.
1,557 dated changesTimeline
Documented cases in chronological order.
2004–2026Statistics
The corpus counted, compared and charted.
221 established findingsOpen Data
Bulk exports and a read-only API, CC BY 4.0.
JSON · CSV · API · CC BY 4.0The database at a glance
Documented findings by category
Documented cases over time
2019–2027 · 70 of 84
Five categories, never conflated
The difference between these is the whole point. An attacked election is not the same as a falsified one.
The recorded numbers do not reflect the votes cast.
Process violationsUnequal media access, repression, illegal financing, vote buying, misuse of state resources.
Foreign interferenceCyberattacks, hack-and-leak, covert foreign financing, impersonation of media or institutions by a foreign state or proxy.
Information operationsTroll farms, fake local-media networks, covert political ads, coordinated inauthentic amplification — foreign or domestic.
Statistical anomaliesPatterns in the data worth examining — explicitly not proof of fraud.
A finding sits in exactly one category. Colors and icons carry the same meaning everywhere on the site.
From the case files
What was proven — and what was not
The clearest test of a trustworthy record is whether it can hold both statements at once.
Russia 2024 Presidential Election
What is established
- Process violationsConfirmed
The election took place in a severely restricted environment: anti-war and genuine opposition candidates were barred, independent domestic monitoring (Golos) was suppressed, and Russia refused to invite OSCE/ODIHR observers — breaking its OSCE commitments. The vote was also held in occupied Ukrainian territories. The European Parliament declared the election neither free nor fair.
More detail
Golos co-chair Grigory Melkonyants, arrested in August 2023, was sentenced by a Moscow court on 14 May 2025 to five years in prison for organising the activities of an 'undesirable' organisation, and barred from public and civic activity for nine years after his release.
- Statistical anomaliesCorroborated
Analysis of precinct-level data by independent analyst Ivan Shukshin estimated around 22 million anomalous votes for Putin — turnout and vote-share distributions showing the patterns characteristic of mass ballot stuffing. Shukshin, who had already left Russia, was placed on the national wanted list on a drug charge in January 2025, which he rejects as retaliation for his election work.
Sources:1
What is not established
- Result falsificationAlleged
The precise scale of any falsification cannot be independently verified: no international observers were present, domestic monitors were suppressed, and multi-day and electronic voting removed paper-based checkability. The anomalous-vote estimates rest on statistical inference from official data rather than direct observation.
Method
Why you can trust this
No source, no claim. The same taxonomy and evidence bar applies to every country, party, and government — including Western democracies.
Read the methodologyAcademy
Learn how elections actually work
How votes are counted and verified, why interference is not the same as fraud, and how to check a viral claim yourself.
Enter the AcademyUpdates
Recently added and revised
- ElectionBosnia and Herzegovina 2022 General Election
- ElectionBulgaria 2024 October Parliamentary Election
- ElectionBolivia 2019 General Election
- ElectionBrazil 2022 Presidential Election
- ElectionGermany 2025 Federal Election
For readers
Free to read, follow and reuse
No account, no paywall and no mailing list — just the record, and simple ways to keep up with it.
Search from any page
The magnifier at the top of every page, or the / key, searches every election, operation, narrative, actor, claim and source at once.
Follow countries
Follow a country and this page keeps its next election in view. Stored only in this browser — no account, nothing sent to us.
40 languages
Read the site in your own language. Translations are machine-made from the English source of record.
Every change, in the open
Each addition and revision is dated and public. Follow them by RSS, or take one digest a week.
Cite and embed
Ready-made citations and BibTeX, and a live card to embed from every case and claim — all under CC BY 4.0.
Send a tip or a correction
Tips, corrections and rights of reply go straight to the editors. Corrections are logged in public.